![]() Better Video & Audio Quality In 2022, Synapse Films released a stunning 4K restoration of Dario Argento’s Tenebrae (1982). It’s a great time to be a fan of horror and physical media. The focus is on horror because that’s obviously what Creepy Catalog is all about, but also because many of the biggest specialty Blu-ray distributors place a strong emphasis on releasing horror and related genre films. ![]() These reasons can be applied to any movie fan regardless of their favorite genres, but special attention is paid to horror movies for each reason listed below. This article lays out seven of the best reasons why you, as a horror fan, should support physical media such as DVD and Blu-ray. Sometimes, buying a movie on physical media is the better choice. BUT, streaming isn’t always the best option for film fans. It’s convenient, there’s always a lot to choose from, and it can be affordable depending on how many streaming services you choose to subscribe to. (This is a movie where the good guys use a helicopter to chop off zombie heads.) And while there are some interesting parallels between this fictional occupation of London and America’s real-world occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan in the mid-2000s, that’s not enough to save what should be a terrifyingly good time but feels more like a mid-tier summer blockbuster.Streaming is great. Unfortunately, that wasn’t enough to save a movie that seemingly missed the point of the original.Ģ8 Weeks Later feels more like a standard Hollywood action flick than the low-budget experiment that came before it. Boyle would return to help direct the sequel’s thrilling opening scene, while Garland reportedly pitched in with extensive script rewrites. So they handed the movie over to a new team. Somewhat less predictably, 28 Weeks Later was sort of a flop.Īt the time it was made, Boyle and Garland were busy working on their psychological space thriller, Sunshine. Predictably, 28 Weeks Later features a full-on zombie outbreak, along with the final reveal that some of those “infected” have made their way to mainland Europe through the tunnel connecting London and Paris. military sweeps into a zombie-virus-ravaged England and attempts to reestablish civilization in London - spoiler alert: it doesn’t end well. 28 Weeks Later arrived in 2007, continuing the story roughly six months later as the U.S. Fox Atomicįans only had to wait four years after seeing 28 Days Later to get a sequel to the instantly iconic horror movie. The problem with 28 Weeks Laterĭanny Boyle helped to direct the opening scene of 28 Weeks Later, which feels noticeably different from the rest of the movie. “If he doesn’t want to direct it himself I’ll be well up for it if we can execute a similarly good idea.”īut why has it taken so long to make this sequel? To answer that question, we have to go back to the original sequel, 28 Weeks Later. “So we’re talking about it quite seriously, quite diligently,” Boyle says. ![]() So who will direct this sequel? Danny Boyle has some ideas. In the two decades since 28 Days Later, Garland has also become a respected director in his own right. “A few years ago an idea materialized in my head for what would be really 28 Years Later,” Garland says, suggesting the next movie will skip the obvious “28 Months Later” naming convention and jump into the future. And in a new interview with Inverse, 28 Days Later director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland provide some extremely exciting updates. For years, the sequel rights were apparently tied up in red tape, but more recently, the original creators and cast have hinted that a sequel is finally in the works. Ever since 28 Weeks Later debuted in 2007, horror fans have wondered if we’ll ever get a third movie in the 28 Days Later franchise.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |